November 24, 2009
I hate spam. I mean I HATE it! Spam is like the static that you can never get rid of on your favorite radio station. Spam is the dead zone for your cell that you hit without fail during an important call. Spam is like when you cut your fingernail too close making it painful to type.
When it comes to social media the “spam” I really despise is not the overt stuff. I block every user I think is a spammer. The real issue I have is the more covert stuff that suckers in so many people. Here is an example.
Giveaway! RT daily 4 chance 2 win [prod #1] + [prod #2] every Friday!
In this instance the offending company is asking me to share this with all of my followers in the hopes that they will get more people to follow them. To what end? What purpose does this serve? To the group of people that have chosen to follow me it is more noise in their stream. Why would I do that to them? Doesn’t this reflect poorly on me? There is no value here to the people that follow me.
You might argue that this company is just using the tool to get it’s message out. This company is not doing anything to get me excited about their products or offerings. If they did then I would be more inclined to share the insight that this company has to offer. How is this any different than a cold call to your home when a company offers you a discount if you will just hand over five friends? Or the sweepstakes that asks for five email addresses so they can spam your friends? Or at large event the guys in clipboards that try to pry information out of you.
Let me be clear about one thing. I’m more inclined to accept this annoyance if this is a rarity for the sender. But the kicker is the company or user must contribute valuable, useful, timely content the other 99% of the time. Otherwise I wouldn’t have followed them initially and would certainly not recommend them to my followers.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by Brooks G.
November 13, 2009
In the last post I spoke about a few things the nook eReader offers that I find somewhat compelling. Since the release I found Michael Gartenberg’s article on Engadget, “Entelligence: Of ebooks and suburban moms” pretty interesting. However, I think he is wrong.
He focuses on three main arguments in his post. But from where I sit and where I live and the circles my family run in, his arguments do not work. Let’s break this down.
Price
The price of the device is $249. Where I live in the Dallas area this is hardly a stumbling block. If anything it provides yet another status symbol for those with disposable income. One look through the carpool lane at the elementary school where my kids attend you’ll see any number of high dollar cars with iPhone toting moms.And iPhone toting kids for that matter.
Backlighting
I don’t disagree with the need for light to read, but how many places are suburban mom’s likely to be where there is no light? Perhaps the movie theater. Otherwise I don’t see this as an issue. Not from a suburban mom perspective. Besides, you can buy a book light if it was really necessary and if you were in dark places frequently and liked to read there you would need light anyway. Additionally, reading on any device with a backlight for extended periods is a beating and distracting to others.
Refresh Rates
I’m not sure that this is going to be an issue for the suburban mom. Refresh rates are inline with turning the page of a book. I don’t expect this will be a huge issue for mom’s adopting the technology.
I think the barriers to getting suburban moms to adopt eReaders is to that they need to find a compelling way to incorporate this into their lives. I see all sorts of uses for this group.
- They can run by the Barnes & Noble store and actually browse books and pick up new titles fairly easily.
- Reading habits are all over the map. One of my kids stands up and dances around while he reads and the other one goes from upside down to right side up every few pages. So reading unusual locations is not a big deal.
- Access to RSS feeds could be useful if someone shows them how easy it is to get started. Today RSS is not part of the equation for this group if you believe these reports. The trick is to build in useful feeds with the ability to add “feeds” without knowing how it all works. Barnes & Noble and Amazon need to make it simple.
- Music is great when reading. When reading “Catcher in the Rye” I listened to The Smiths “Louder Than Bombs” record. Strangely fitting, but sometimes music can help set your mood. Adding a player will not replace the MP3 player, but helps make it easy to take some tunes along for the ride.
In my neck of the woods(suburbia) it will only take a few influential moms to tote this thing around and it will sell. But getting them to incorporate this into their lives is the bigger challenge.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized | Tagged: eCommerce, mobile, nook, observations, web |
Permalink
Posted by Brooks G.
November 9, 2009

Image borrowed from www.bn.com/nook
For months I’ve seen eReaders come and go on the tech blogs. I usually pass it off as another techy gadget that looks cool, but would have little use for in my daily routine. The basic gadget as an electronic storage and display device for text has been around in various forms for years. None of the products released thus far has done anything to pique my passing curiosity. Initially this latest entry into the mix did little to rouse my interest either. But a couple of things look promising.
The nook is the latest attempt by a retailer to get the tech savvy to read books in a digital format. Amazon has the popular Kindle reader. Sony and others have similar devices and have seen mixed reviews and limited success no doubt due in part to their lack of content distribution. It appears the perception is that people will flock to a reader like they did with MP3 players once Apple released the iPod. I’m not sure that is going to happen, but as these devices improve in form and function I think they could convince me to buy one.
Using the compare page for the nook, and yes I know it is bias, there are a few things that standout for me that could make me a believer. The nook supports direct loading/viewing of PDF files. This is interesting to me. I hate to read documents on my laptop(s) and when editing lengthy docs I end up with several printed copies that I scribble all over. Having a reader might actually save some paper, but more importantly digitally document what I need to edit. The kicker would when others are reviewing/editing your document. If they have a way to sync their comments back to you then you wouldn’t have to decipher their chicken scratch. Or how about those cryptic emails that tell you where to make edits but aren’t specific enough.
Here is where I start to get a little nerdy. Sharing books. B&N are using, get ready for this, LendMe™ technology. This is a promising feature that allows you to “lend” a book 1 time to 1 user. The Consumerist details the shortcomings of this methodology and I’m sure B&N are going to hear it from consumers when they figure out how lame this is. The reason this excites me is that people are going to yell and scream about this or not buy the product. The solution could be libraries. How great would it be to run up to the library and “borrow” a book for two weeks. Could this be a player in the library world? Perhaps if “LendMe” were extended to other devices then it might be work.
The other thing that gets me excited is the ability to share the content among different devices, including notes and annotations. This means you can make notes while reading a PDF on the plane using the nook and when you are ready to mess with the content again you fire up the laptop and it’s off to the races. That rounds out the good. But there is more to the story.
Up next, a response to Michael Gartenberg’s article on Engadget, “Entelligence: Of ebooks and suburban moms“
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized | Tagged: eCommerce, innovation, news, nook |
Permalink
Posted by Brooks G.
October 28, 2009
I love going through our web analytics tool, WebTrends. The sheer volume of information collected is staggering and you can weave your way through revenue numbers, visits, page views and other useless bits of data for hours at a time. What I find really fascinating is the changes that occur over time.
My first pass at looking at browser stats several years ago was typical for the time. Firefox 2 and IE7 were just released and Safari was not ideal even for Mac users. The breakdown back then was IE 88%, Firefox 7.5% and Safari 2.75%. Today the breakdown nearly three years later the numbers look a little different with IE 74%, Firefox 15% and Safari 8%. What I like about these stats is the ability to see the change over time and speculation.
You might be saying, “So what?” This one piece of information alone isn’t the only thing to take into account as there are other pieces of data that need to be considered in this context to formulate any sort of hypothesis. Based only on this stat you could argue that Mac users are an increasingly important user base. Afterall three years ago at most about 10% could be Mac users. More recently you could argue the max number of users could be 23%.
The danger is that change like the example above can lead to misinterpretation and overreaction. Sure there may in fact be more Mac users than before, but the hard part is figuring out if it really makes a difference. How will the information be used to better the customer experience? So often we grab a snapshot of where we are today, last week or this month. While long term trends are not the most important variable, I think there is great value in seeing how customer trends appear over a much longer period of time. In this case further research might yield some additional considerations to providing a better customer experience.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized | Tagged: browsers, observations, web |
Permalink
Posted by Brooks G.
September 21, 2009
Several weeks ago I read a blog post or Tweet from someone announcing Alice.com as the latest e-commerce shopping site around. Sorry to whomever announced it but it clearly didn’t leave a burning impression on my brain. Then this post from TechCrunch pops up via Twitter and so I had to make my way over to Alice.com again to see if anything changed. Clearly they know what they are doing and have a business model that appears attractive to the VC’s out in the valley.
I see this as a pretty neat opportunity to save a little money and at the same time “automate” some mundane tasks that would free up time for my wife to do other things. Just think of the quality time she could spend with me watching the Cowboys suffer another heart wrenching defeat instead of going to the grocery store. Okay, not really, but I would have less, “Can you pick up XXXX on the way home?” trips.
As cool as this tool is my wife will never use it. Not even consider it. Despite the apparent ease of use and cost savings it just isn’t for her. Although she began her career in a web services company she prefers the tangible to the intangible. Her preference is to us a day planner and physically write everything down. She has lists for everything. I think she made a list for me to boil water one time. The hurdle online companies face is that people like my wife are not motivated by time savings shopping online because the list management is fairly detailed and daunting. She compares, size, color, weight and price in the context of a grocery store. If an item is on sale when she happens to be in the store she may choose to purchase based on a price motivation, yet other times price will not win over quality.
I have not tried to figure out how she shops. I’ve been to the grocery store with her and have since been banned from ever doing that again. She appears to adopt some sort of Coast Guard search patter than flies in the face of logic. Truth be told my father used to do the shopping in my family when I was a kid and literally organized his list in the order it was laid out in the store. I mean from endcap to endcap his list was laid out like a map. I wish the Alice.com team the best of luck and perhaps one day the logic will exist to do some predictive analysis on the buying habits of my wife.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by Brooks G.